No matter what the type of organization, playing an active role in the political decision-making process and policy formation is no longer a luxury—it is an imperative.
A coronavirus pandemic (or even the threat of such a pandemic) could easily make it more difficult for parties to perform their obligations under many types of contracts—especially contracts requiring travel or involving the delivery of goods and services. In the event that one of the parties to a contract can’t perform as a result of an actual or potential coronavirus outbreak, would the doctrine of force majeure allow them to suspend their performance or terminate the contract?
Julia Rhine helps her clients navigate Colorado’s complex oil and gas landscape with political savvy and a talent for collaborative problem solving. She focuses her practice on cases involving state and local government regulatory energy frameworks, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and other matters subject to review under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) or other procedural statutes. She frequently handles enforcement proceedings before the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.
Julia represents clients on a range of natural resources matters involving sensitive or contentious stakeholder issues. She also routinely advises energy firms and investors on issues affecting the oil and gas industry in Colorado, including impacts from litigation, potential statewide ballot and legislative measures, state and local regulations, and the potential impacts of state and local political elections.
In an industry fraught with political uncertainty, Julia considers every stakeholder at the table and keeps long-term goals in view while working on short-term solutions. She has built a reputation for finding opportunities for compromise in difficult situations and creating resolutions that withstand regulatory volatility.
Prior to joining the firm, Julia worked as a law clerk to the Hon. Richard P. Matsch and the Hon. John L. Kane of the U.S. District Court, District of Colorado.
Won a major ruling in Adams County District Court on behalf of client, Colorado Oil & Gas Association (COGA) and the American Petroleum Institute (API). COGA and API jointly filed suit in October to overturn a number of oil and gas regulations adopted by the City of Thornton. Colorado District Court Judge Edward Moss ruled that many of Thornton’s regulations, including its setback regulations, were illegal and operationall preempted by state law.
• Successfully represented Extraction Oil and Gas in Boulder District Court against Boulder County’s challenge to Extraction’s leases. The Court ruled against Boulder’s theory that pooling restrictions in the leases precluded Extraction from pooling multiple leases, and held for Extraction on all points of law.
Member, Wonderbound Board of Trustees and Development Committee
Attendance Mediation Workshops, Denver Public Schools
Who's Who in Energy, Denver Business Journal, 2019
Co-founder and co-chair, The Michigan Energy Law Association
Founder and co-chair, National Cultural Heritage Law Moot Court Competition
Colorado Bar Association
Denver Bar Association